STPs are ideal for investors who have a lump-sum amount at their disposal. So, if you have just received your annual bonus or proceeds from a property sale, you can consider STP. Here’s a list of reasons why STP is a better option than lump-sum investing in mutual funds:
Market risk
Equity mutual funds carry a higher market risk than any other category of mutual funds. Investing a lump-sum amount into an equity-focused mutual fund scheme can enhance the impact of this market risk on your portfolio. If the markets perform well, you could mint a high profit from such an investment. However, if markets fall, a substantial portion of your invested funds can get eroded in the short-term. This is one of the many reasons why STP is better than lump-sum investing when it comes to MFs. STP allows you to transfer sums periodically and gain market advantage by changing to securities that offer higher returns. In this way, STPs help safeguard your interests during market fluctuations, minimising the market timing risk associated with lump-sum investments.
Better returns
STPs allow you to invest at different levels of the market, offering potential opportunities for better returns over time. Spreading your investments across asset classes and sectors helps you leverage market dips and peaks to maximise returns at all times. This is a far better approach compared to lump-sum investing, where your returns are entirely dependent on how market conditions impact your single investment. This is one of the reasons why STP is better than investing lump-sum in mutual funds.
Cost averaging
Working like SIPs, STPs offer the benefit of cost averaging over time. Since you invest at regular intervals regardless of market conditions, the average cost per unit reduces over time. This also helps lower the impact of market volatility on your investment. Conversely, when you make lump-sum investments, the entire invested amount is subject to the current market state making it difficult to benefit from market ups and downs.
Flexibility
When it comes to investment flexibility, STPs are better than lump-sum investing. You have the option of customising your STP directive to suit your needs. Depending on the market conditions and your liquidity requirements, you can hasten the transfer pace, make it slower, or even stop the STP at any time. This absence of this adaptability in lump-sum investments makes STPs better than lump-sum investing in mutual funds.
Rebalancing
STPs allow you to switch from one mutual fund scheme to another. They play a key role in effectively rebalancing your portfolio to ensure that your asset allocation remains well-aligned with your financial goals. For instance, if money in your equity investments increases, raising your risk exposure beyond the target level, it can be reallocated to debt funds through STPs to balance risk. Transferring funds systematically allows you to maintain a balance between equity and debt exposure in your portfolio. Lump-sum investments, on the other hand, require manual rebalancing which can be time-consuming and result in missed opportunities in shifting markets.